PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MJUS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and ^GSPC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-51.73%
6.72%
MJUS
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MJUS:

-0.88

^GSPC:

1.62

Sortino Ratio

MJUS:

-1.38

^GSPC:

2.20

Omega Ratio

MJUS:

0.82

^GSPC:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

MJUS:

-0.68

^GSPC:

2.46

Martin Ratio

MJUS:

-1.63

^GSPC:

10.01

Ulcer Index

MJUS:

38.74%

^GSPC:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

MJUS:

72.15%

^GSPC:

12.88%

Max Drawdown

MJUS:

-92.43%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

MJUS:

-92.38%

^GSPC:

-2.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJUS achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 2.24% return.


MJUS

YTD

-8.93%

1M

-0.59%

6M

-51.76%

1Y

-61.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

2.24%

1M

-1.20%

6M

6.72%

1Y

18.21%

5Y*

12.53%

10Y*

11.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MJUS is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.871.62
The chart of Sortino ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -1.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-1.332.20
The chart of Omega ratio for MJUS, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.821.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.662.46
The chart of Martin ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -1.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-1.4710.01
MJUS
^GSPC

The current MJUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJUS and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.87
1.62
MJUS
^GSPC

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJUS drawdown since its inception was -92.43%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJUS and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-92.38%
-2.13%
MJUS
^GSPC

Volatility

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.43%. This indicates that MJUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.45%
3.43%
MJUS
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab