PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MJUS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-45.63%
12.53%
MJUS
^GSPC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJUS achieves a -38.27% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 25.15% return.


MJUS

YTD

-38.27%

1M

-41.10%

6M

-45.64%

1Y

-38.49%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

25.15%

1M

2.97%

6M

12.53%

1Y

31.00%

5Y (annualized)

13.95%

10Y (annualized)

11.21%

Key characteristics


MJUS^GSPC
Sharpe Ratio-0.522.53
Sortino Ratio-0.383.39
Omega Ratio0.951.47
Calmar Ratio-0.423.65
Martin Ratio-1.3716.21
Ulcer Index28.07%1.91%
Daily Std Dev74.61%12.23%
Max Drawdown-90.90%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-90.37%-0.53%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between MJUS and ^GSPC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.522.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.383.39
The chart of Omega ratio for MJUS, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.951.47
The chart of Calmar ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.423.65
The chart of Martin ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -1.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-1.3716.21
MJUS
^GSPC

The current MJUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJUS and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.52
2.53
MJUS
^GSPC

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJUS drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJUS and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-90.37%
-0.53%
MJUS
^GSPC

Volatility

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) has a higher volatility of 40.35% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.97%. This indicates that MJUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
40.35%
3.97%
MJUS
^GSPC